The commercial laws of supply and demand essentially dictate that the more common a product or service, the cheaper it costs to buy. Conversely, the scarcer a commodity becomes, the more expensive it becomes to acquire.

Laws of Supply and Demand
This demand is often inflated or deflated by changes in fashion, ease and cost of production and dare I say it; tightly controlled supply chains (think diamonds or oil production if you need examples of this).
It’s basic economics with principles that should be familiar to all readers of this blog (apologies to my North Korean readers here).
Closer to home; over the last 10 years, the UK has seen Internet access prices fall dramatically with high-speed broadband now being given away by some ISPs free as part of a telecoms bundle. It’s not that may years ago that dial-up was the norm’ with a £10 per month subscription fee AND a 10p per minute connection fee being levied for a 56K dial-up access service! A company I worked for back in the early 1990’s was paying £25K per year for a 2Mb leased line into its offices which was considered to be fast!
Seems incredible doesn’t it when most homes in the UK, now have access to at least a 2mb connection for less than the cost of their daily newspaper?
That’s what market competition does for a service that is now considered to be a “must-have commodity” by many people.
The same can be said for web hosting, domain names, computers (now less than the average weekly wage each) and the once revered mobile phone. The list goes on!
When commodities that we come to depend upon, like a reliable Internet connection or robust web hosting, have a steadily reducing purchase cost, we don’t necessarily value them in any other way either. That is until they are taken away from us.
BOGOF
In sales it’s a common strategy to give something the client values highly, but costs very little for the provider to supply; away for free by way of a “carrot” on the end of “stick”, to help close a deal.
There’s lots of examples of this promotional technique knocking around; “1 years free insurance with each new car”, “12 months web hosting with each website”, “free 2 hour consultation”, “buy one get one free (BOGOF)”, “free laptop with every 18 month mobile contract”, “free month’s trial” You get the idea!
The downside of this strategy, particularly if undertaken across a whole industry; is that it soon becomes a standard offering. I.e. it becomes ‘normal’ and the consumer comes to expect it. So when the time comes to draw the promotion to an end by removing the offer or applying a price to the formally ‘free service’ then problems begin.
Free Visuals
The graphic design industry is one of many industries that suffers from this situation. In the design sector it’s common practice amongst agencies to offer “free visuals” as part of the pitch to the client. By offering free design work for a particular client’s brief as part of their sales pitch to them, an agency is able to demonstrate their creativity and ability to do the job for the client.
I can see the thinking behind the concept. However, the practice is so common place that many clients don’t value the work that has gone into such design work; which can easily occupy several days of studio time for zero revenue. Furthermore clients used to this approach, have now come to expect it from all design agencies.
A classic example of a high value service (which design work is) being devalued to zero through “give away” sales practices!
Bucking the Trend
Smaller agencies and freelance designers can ill afford to give several days of design work away free of charge on the off chance that they may be awarded a job in preferance to a larger agency which enjoys a large, in-house design studio containing banks of designers looking for something to do.
So its nice to see a trend amongst the smaller design agencies who are starting to practice a “No Free Visuals” policy.
“Yes Mr. Client we can do some pre-contract design work, however it’ll be classed as one off billable work. Is that okay?”
Inevitably the answer to this question is likely to be a resounding “No” from the client with the subsequent loss of pitching opportunity. However, a decision by the agency needs to be made: do they spend their days working for nothing, or do they concentrate their efforts on fee paying clients?
In other words, do they value their worth? If yes, keep chipping away!
Spend time analyzing your own business and what you spend your time on. If you find you’re spending to much effort giving away your valuable time or expertise for free, then perhaps its time you started to “value your worth”.

Hi Jaimie,
Yes, I have had this issue several times with clients who don’t understand the value of your product or service(s). I find I have to educate them by breaking down the key elements of my products/services in order to show them the full value/benefits.
I have ended up turning projects away numerous times in order to keep my pricing structure at a stable and professional rate.
Nice post!
Hi Jaimie,
Spot on! — and it’s not just designers. Us photographers get asked to do ‘test shoots’ for free as well, usually for ‘big clients’ with a hint that there’ll be ‘loads of work coming your way’.
We refuse to do these, and yes, I’m sure we lose some business along the way. But, the clients that we do shoot for really value our work, and we feel better about ourselves. The whole creative industry needs to try and put a stop to this as soon as possible.
Cheers
Paul
Good article on a topic I can certainly relate to! We too operate a No Free Visuals policy and have lost work in the past for this, however we wouldn’t have it any other way.
Offering free visuals also has the knock on effect of lowering the quality and effectiveness of work the industry — how can a designer(s) produce a visual at such an early stage without fully understanding the client and their needs? The simple answer is; they can’t. Free visuals lead not only to designers working for nothing, but also less effective end results for clients.