<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personalized FaceBook URLs — Who Really Cares?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inetinsights.com/social-networking/personalized-facebook-urls-who-really-cares/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inetinsights.com/social-networking/personalized-facebook-urls-who-really-cares/</link>
	<description>Internet business blog from the UK Internet consultant Jaimie Dobson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny Matharu</title>
		<link>http://www.inetinsights.com/social-networking/personalized-facebook-urls-who-really-cares/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Matharu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inetengineers.com/?p=553#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi Jaimie

Thanks for this. I got mine after reading this and will try and get the &#039;Fan Page&#039; ones when they come out.

Social Networking seems to now be the norm for business networking also and to be able to quote your Twitter and FB page simply (mine are both the same /dannymatharu) makes sense.

Why didn&#039;t FB do this in the first instance? Was it simply because they didn&#039;t think it would be as big as it is and thus turn into such a big &#039;business&#039; tool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jaimie</p>
<p>Thanks for this. I got mine after reading this and will try and get the ‘Fan Page’ ones when they come out.</p>
<p>Social Networking seems to now be the norm for business networking also and to be able to quote your Twitter and FB page simply (mine are both the same /dannymatharu) makes sense.</p>
<p>Why didn’t FB do this in the first instance? Was it simply because they didn’t think it would be as big as it is and thus turn into such a big ‘business’ tool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia Vargo</title>
		<link>http://www.inetinsights.com/social-networking/personalized-facebook-urls-who-really-cares/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia Vargo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inetengineers.com/?p=553#comment-28</guid>
		<description>This is great for people who want to preserve their online identity, and for many people who use sites such as Twitter they can have the same username, which is obviously easier for people to remember and helps preserve their identity. However, if you&#039;re slow off the mark, how bad would you feel if someone else used your username? They could say anything, and other people may think they were you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great for people who want to preserve their online identity, and for many people who use sites such as Twitter they can have the same username, which is obviously easier for people to remember and helps preserve their identity. However, if you’re slow off the mark, how bad would you feel if someone else used your username? They could say anything, and other people may think they were you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
